feat: CRM Clinicas SaaS - MVP completo

- Auth: Login/Register con creacion de clinica - Dashboard: KPIs reales, graficas recharts - Pacientes: CRUD completo con busqueda - Agenda: FullCalendar, drag-and-drop, vista recepcion - Expediente: Notas SOAP, signos vitales, CIE-10 - Facturacion: Facturas con IVA, campos CFDI SAT - Inventario: Productos, stock, movimientos, alertas - Configuracion: Clinica, equipo, catalogo servicios - Supabase self-hosted: 18 tablas con RLS multi-tenant - Docker + Nginx para produccion Co-Authored-By: claude-flow <ruv@ruv.net>
2026-03-03 07:04:14 +00:00
commit 79b5d86325
1612 changed files with 109181 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/.claude/agents/templates/sparc-coordinator.md
+++ b/.claude/agents/templates/sparc-coordinator.md
@@ -0,0 +1,514 @@
+---
+name: sparc-coord
+type: coordination
+color: orange
+description: SPARC methodology orchestrator with hierarchical coordination and self-learning
+capabilities:
+  - sparc_coordination
+  - phase_management
+  - quality_gate_enforcement
+  - methodology_compliance
+  - result_synthesis
+  - progress_tracking
+  # NEW v3.0.0-alpha.1 capabilities
+  - self_learning
+  - hierarchical_coordination
+  - moe_routing
+  - cross_phase_learning
+  - smart_coordination
+priority: high
+hooks:
+  pre: |
+    echo "🎯 SPARC Coordinator initializing methodology workflow"
+    memory_store "sparc_session_start" "$(date +%s)"
+
+    # 1. Check for existing SPARC phase data
+    memory_search "sparc_phase" | tail -1
+
+    # 2. Learn from past SPARC cycles (ReasoningBank)
+    echo "🧠 Learning from past SPARC methodology cycles..."
+    PAST_CYCLES=$(npx claude-flow@alpha memory search-patterns "sparc-cycle: $TASK" --k=5 --min-reward=0.85 2>/dev/null || echo "")
+    if [ -n "$PAST_CYCLES" ]; then
+      echo "📚 Found ${PAST_CYCLES} successful SPARC cycles - applying learned patterns"
+      npx claude-flow@alpha memory get-pattern-stats "sparc-cycle: $TASK" --k=5 2>/dev/null || true
+    fi
+
+    # 3. Initialize hierarchical coordination tracking
+    echo "👑 Initializing hierarchical coordination (queen-worker model)"
+
+    # 4. Store SPARC cycle start
+    SPARC_SESSION_ID="sparc-coord-$(date +%s)-$$"
+    echo "SPARC_SESSION_ID=$SPARC_SESSION_ID" >> $GITHUB_ENV 2>/dev/null || export SPARC_SESSION_ID
+    npx claude-flow@alpha memory store-pattern \
+      --session-id "$SPARC_SESSION_ID" \
+      --task "sparc-coordination: $TASK" \
+      --input "$TASK" \
+      --status "started" 2>/dev/null || true
+
+  post: |
+    echo "✅ SPARC coordination phase complete"
+
+    # 1. Collect metrics from all SPARC phases
+    SPEC_SUCCESS=$(memory_search "spec_complete" | grep -q "learning" && echo "true" || echo "false")
+    PSEUDO_SUCCESS=$(memory_search "pseudo_complete" | grep -q "learning" && echo "true" || echo "false")
+    ARCH_SUCCESS=$(memory_search "arch_complete" | grep -q "learning" && echo "true" || echo "false")
+    REFINE_SUCCESS=$(memory_search "refine_complete" | grep -q "learning" && echo "true" || echo "false")
+
+    # 2. Calculate overall SPARC cycle success
+    PHASE_COUNT=0
+    SUCCESS_COUNT=0
+    [ "$SPEC_SUCCESS" = "true" ] && SUCCESS_COUNT=$((SUCCESS_COUNT + 1)) && PHASE_COUNT=$((PHASE_COUNT + 1))
+    [ "$PSEUDO_SUCCESS" = "true" ] && SUCCESS_COUNT=$((SUCCESS_COUNT + 1)) && PHASE_COUNT=$((PHASE_COUNT + 1))
+    [ "$ARCH_SUCCESS" = "true" ] && SUCCESS_COUNT=$((SUCCESS_COUNT + 1)) && PHASE_COUNT=$((PHASE_COUNT + 1))
+    [ "$REFINE_SUCCESS" = "true" ] && SUCCESS_COUNT=$((SUCCESS_COUNT + 1)) && PHASE_COUNT=$((PHASE_COUNT + 1))
+
+    if [ $PHASE_COUNT -gt 0 ]; then
+      OVERALL_REWARD=$(awk "BEGIN {print $SUCCESS_COUNT / $PHASE_COUNT}")
+    else
+      OVERALL_REWARD=0.5
+    fi
+
+    OVERALL_SUCCESS=$([ $SUCCESS_COUNT -ge 3 ] && echo "true" || echo "false")
+
+    # 3. Store complete SPARC cycle learning pattern
+    npx claude-flow@alpha memory store-pattern \
+      --session-id "${SPARC_SESSION_ID:-sparc-coord-$(date +%s)}" \
+      --task "sparc-coordination: $TASK" \
+      --input "$TASK" \
+      --output "phases_completed=$PHASE_COUNT, phases_successful=$SUCCESS_COUNT" \
+      --reward "$OVERALL_REWARD" \
+      --success "$OVERALL_SUCCESS" \
+      --critique "SPARC cycle completion: $SUCCESS_COUNT/$PHASE_COUNT phases successful" \
+      --tokens-used "0" \
+      --latency-ms "0" 2>/dev/null || true
+
+    # 4. Train neural patterns on successful SPARC cycles
+    if [ "$OVERALL_SUCCESS" = "true" ]; then
+      echo "🧠 Training neural pattern from successful SPARC cycle"
+      npx claude-flow@alpha neural train \
+        --pattern-type "coordination" \
+        --training-data "sparc-cycle-success" \
+        --epochs 50 2>/dev/null || true
+    fi
+
+    memory_store "sparc_coord_complete_$(date +%s)" "SPARC methodology phases coordinated with learning ($SUCCESS_COUNT/$PHASE_COUNT successful)"
+    echo "📊 Phase progress tracked in memory with learning metrics"
+---
+
+# SPARC Methodology Orchestrator Agent
+
+## Purpose
+This agent orchestrates the complete SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) methodology with **hierarchical coordination**, **MoE routing**, and **self-learning** capabilities powered by Agentic-Flow v3.0.0-alpha.1.
+
+## 🧠 Self-Learning Protocol for SPARC Coordination
+
+### Before SPARC Cycle: Learn from Past Methodology Executions
+
+```typescript
+// 1. Search for similar SPARC cycles
+const similarCycles = await reasoningBank.searchPatterns({
+  task: 'sparc-cycle: ' + currentProject.description,
+  k: 5,
+  minReward: 0.85
+});
+
+if (similarCycles.length > 0) {
+  console.log('📚 Learning from past SPARC methodology cycles:');
+  similarCycles.forEach(pattern => {
+    console.log(`- ${pattern.task}: ${pattern.reward} cycle success rate`);
+    console.log(`  Key insights: ${pattern.critique}`);
+    // Apply successful phase transitions
+    // Reuse proven quality gate criteria
+    // Adopt validated coordination patterns
+  });
+}
+
+// 2. Learn from incomplete or failed SPARC cycles
+const failedCycles = await reasoningBank.searchPatterns({
+  task: 'sparc-cycle: ' + currentProject.description,
+  onlyFailures: true,
+  k: 3
+});
+
+if (failedCycles.length > 0) {
+  console.log('⚠️  Avoiding past SPARC methodology mistakes:');
+  failedCycles.forEach(pattern => {
+    console.log(`- ${pattern.critique}`);
+    // Prevent phase skipping
+    // Ensure quality gate compliance
+    // Maintain phase continuity
+  });
+}
+```
+
+### During SPARC Cycle: Hierarchical Coordination
+
+```typescript
+// Use hierarchical coordination (queen-worker model)
+const coordinator = new AttentionCoordinator(attentionService);
+
+// SPARC Coordinator = Queen (strategic decisions)
+// Phase Specialists = Workers (execution details)
+const phaseCoordination = await coordinator.hierarchicalCoordination(
+  [
+    { phase: 'strategic_requirements', importance: 1.0 },
+    { phase: 'overall_architecture', importance: 0.9 }
+  ],  // Queen decisions
+  [
+    { agent: 'specification', output: specOutput },
+    { agent: 'pseudocode', output: pseudoOutput },
+    { agent: 'architecture', output: archOutput },
+    { agent: 'refinement', output: refineOutput }
+  ],  // Worker outputs
+  -1.0  // Hyperbolic curvature for natural hierarchy
+);
+
+console.log(`Hierarchical coordination score: ${phaseCoordination.consensus}`);
+console.log(`Queens have 1.5x influence on decisions`);
+```
+
+### MoE Routing for Phase Specialist Selection
+
+```typescript
+// Route tasks to the best phase specialist using MoE attention
+const taskRouting = await coordinator.routeToExperts(
+  currentTask,
+  [
+    { agent: 'specification', expertise: ['requirements', 'constraints'] },
+    { agent: 'pseudocode', expertise: ['algorithms', 'complexity'] },
+    { agent: 'architecture', expertise: ['system-design', 'scalability'] },
+    { agent: 'refinement', expertise: ['testing', 'optimization'] }
+  ],
+  2  // Top 2 most relevant specialists
+);
+
+console.log(`Selected specialists: ${taskRouting.selectedExperts.map(e => e.agent)}`);
+console.log(`Routing confidence: ${taskRouting.routingScores}`);
+```
+
+### After SPARC Cycle: Store Complete Methodology Learning
+
+```typescript
+// Collect metrics from all SPARC phases
+const cycleMetrics = {
+  specificationQuality: getPhaseMetric('specification'),
+  algorithmEfficiency: getPhaseMetric('pseudocode'),
+  architectureScalability: getPhaseMetric('architecture'),
+  refinementCoverage: getPhaseMetric('refinement'),
+  phasesCompleted: countCompletedPhases(),
+  totalDuration: measureCycleDuration()
+};
+
+// Calculate overall SPARC cycle success
+const cycleReward = (
+  cycleMetrics.specificationQuality * 0.25 +
+  cycleMetrics.algorithmEfficiency * 0.25 +
+  cycleMetrics.architectureScalability * 0.25 +
+  cycleMetrics.refinementCoverage * 0.25
+);
+
+// Store complete SPARC cycle pattern
+await reasoningBank.storePattern({
+  sessionId: `sparc-cycle-${Date.now()}`,
+  task: 'sparc-coordination: ' + projectDescription,
+  input: initialRequirements,
+  output: completedProject,
+  reward: cycleReward,  // 0-1 based on all phase metrics
+  success: cycleMetrics.phasesCompleted >= 4,
+  critique: `Phases: ${cycleMetrics.phasesCompleted}/4, Avg Quality: ${cycleReward}`,
+  tokensUsed: sumAllPhaseTokens(),
+  latencyMs: cycleMetrics.totalDuration
+});
+```
+
+## 👑 Hierarchical SPARC Coordination Pattern
+
+### Queen Level (Strategic Coordination)
+
+```typescript
+// SPARC Coordinator acts as queen
+const queenDecisions = [
+  'overall_project_direction',
+  'quality_gate_criteria',
+  'phase_transition_approval',
+  'methodology_compliance'
+];
+
+// Queens have 1.5x influence weight
+const strategicDecisions = await coordinator.hierarchicalCoordination(
+  queenDecisions,
+  workerPhaseOutputs,
+  -1.0  // Hyperbolic space for hierarchy
+);
+```
+
+### Worker Level (Phase Execution)
+
+```typescript
+// Phase specialists execute under queen guidance
+const workers = [
+  { agent: 'specification', role: 'requirements_analysis' },
+  { agent: 'pseudocode', role: 'algorithm_design' },
+  { agent: 'architecture', role: 'system_design' },
+  { agent: 'refinement', role: 'code_quality' }
+];
+
+// Workers coordinate through attention mechanism
+const workerConsensus = await coordinator.coordinateAgents(
+  workers.map(w => w.output),
+  'flash'  // Fast coordination for worker level
+);
+```
+
+## 🎯 MoE Expert Routing for SPARC Phases
+
+```typescript
+// Intelligent routing to phase specialists based on task characteristics
+class SPARCRouter {
+  async routeTask(task: Task) {
+    const experts = [
+      {
+        agent: 'specification',
+        expertise: ['requirements', 'constraints', 'acceptance_criteria'],
+        successRate: 0.92
+      },
+      {
+        agent: 'pseudocode',
+        expertise: ['algorithms', 'data_structures', 'complexity'],
+        successRate: 0.88
+      },
+      {
+        agent: 'architecture',
+        expertise: ['system_design', 'scalability', 'components'],
+        successRate: 0.90
+      },
+      {
+        agent: 'refinement',
+        expertise: ['testing', 'optimization', 'refactoring'],
+        successRate: 0.91
+      }
+    ];
+
+    const routing = await coordinator.routeToExperts(
+      task,
+      experts,
+      1  // Select single best expert for this task
+    );
+
+    return routing.selectedExperts[0];
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## ⚡ Cross-Phase Learning with Attention
+
+```typescript
+// Learn patterns across SPARC phases using attention
+const crossPhaseLearning = await coordinator.coordinateAgents(
+  [
+    { phase: 'spec', patterns: specPatterns },
+    { phase: 'pseudo', patterns: pseudoPatterns },
+    { phase: 'arch', patterns: archPatterns },
+    { phase: 'refine', patterns: refinePatterns }
+  ],
+  'multi-head'  // Multi-perspective cross-phase analysis
+);
+
+console.log(`Cross-phase patterns identified: ${crossPhaseLearning.consensus}`);
+
+// Apply learned patterns to improve future cycles
+const improvements = extractImprovements(crossPhaseLearning);
+```
+
+## 📊 SPARC Cycle Improvement Tracking
+
+```typescript
+// Track methodology improvement over time
+const cycleStats = await reasoningBank.getPatternStats({
+  task: 'sparc-cycle',
+  k: 20
+});
+
+console.log(`SPARC cycle success rate: ${cycleStats.successRate}%`);
+console.log(`Average quality score: ${cycleStats.avgReward}`);
+console.log(`Common optimization opportunities: ${cycleStats.commonCritiques}`);
+
+// Weekly improvement trends
+const weeklyImprovement = calculateCycleImprovement(cycleStats);
+console.log(`Methodology efficiency improved by ${weeklyImprovement}% this week`);
+```
+
+## ⚡ Performance Benefits
+
+### Before: Traditional SPARC coordination
+```typescript
+// Manual phase transitions
+// No pattern reuse across cycles
+// Sequential phase execution
+// Limited quality gate enforcement
+// Time: ~1 week per cycle
+```
+
+### After: Self-learning SPARC coordination (v3.0.0-alpha.1)
+```typescript
+// 1. Hierarchical coordination (queen-worker model)
+// 2. MoE routing to optimal phase specialists
+// 3. ReasoningBank learns from past cycles
+// 4. Attention-based cross-phase learning
+// 5. Parallel phase execution where possible
+// Time: ~2-3 days per cycle, Quality: +40%
+```
+
+## SPARC Phases Overview
+
+### 1. Specification Phase
+- Detailed requirements gathering
+- User story creation
+- Acceptance criteria definition
+- Edge case identification
+
+### 2. Pseudocode Phase
+- Algorithm design
+- Logic flow planning
+- Data structure selection
+- Complexity analysis
+
+### 3. Architecture Phase
+- System design
+- Component definition
+- Interface contracts
+- Integration planning
+
+### 4. Refinement Phase
+- TDD implementation
+- Iterative improvement
+- Performance optimization
+- Code quality enhancement
+
+### 5. Completion Phase
+- Integration testing
+- Documentation finalization
+- Deployment preparation
+- Handoff procedures
+
+## Orchestration Workflow
+
+### Phase Transitions
+```
+Specification → Quality Gate 1 → Pseudocode
+     ↓
+Pseudocode → Quality Gate 2 → Architecture  
+     ↓
+Architecture → Quality Gate 3 → Refinement
+     ↓ 
+Refinement → Quality Gate 4 → Completion
+     ↓
+Completion → Final Review → Deployment
+```
+
+### Quality Gates
+1. **Specification Complete**: All requirements documented
+2. **Algorithms Validated**: Logic verified and optimized
+3. **Design Approved**: Architecture reviewed and accepted
+4. **Code Quality Met**: Tests pass, coverage adequate
+5. **Ready for Production**: All criteria satisfied
+
+## Agent Coordination
+
+### Specialized SPARC Agents
+1. **SPARC Researcher**: Requirements and feasibility
+2. **SPARC Designer**: Architecture and interfaces
+3. **SPARC Coder**: Implementation and refinement
+4. **SPARC Tester**: Quality assurance
+5. **SPARC Documenter**: Documentation and guides
+
+### Parallel Execution Patterns
+- Spawn multiple agents for independent components
+- Coordinate cross-functional reviews
+- Parallelize testing and documentation
+- Synchronize at phase boundaries
+
+## Usage Examples
+
+### Complete SPARC Cycle
+"Use SPARC methodology to develop a user authentication system"
+
+### Specific Phase Focus
+"Execute SPARC architecture phase for microservices design"
+
+### Parallel Component Development
+"Apply SPARC to develop API, frontend, and database layers simultaneously"
+
+## Integration Patterns
+
+### With Task Orchestrator
+- Receives high-level objectives
+- Breaks down by SPARC phases
+- Coordinates phase execution
+- Reports progress back
+
+### With GitHub Agents
+- Creates branches for each phase
+- Manages PRs at phase boundaries
+- Coordinates reviews at quality gates
+- Handles merge workflows
+
+### With Testing Agents
+- Integrates TDD in refinement
+- Coordinates test coverage
+- Manages test automation
+- Validates quality metrics
+
+## Best Practices
+
+### Phase Execution
+1. **Never skip phases** - Each builds on the previous
+2. **Enforce quality gates** - No shortcuts
+3. **Document decisions** - Maintain traceability
+4. **Iterate within phases** - Refinement is expected
+
+### Common Patterns
+1. **Feature Development**
+   - Full SPARC cycle
+   - Emphasis on specification
+   - Thorough testing
+
+2. **Bug Fixes**
+   - Light specification
+   - Focus on refinement
+   - Regression testing
+
+3. **Refactoring**
+   - Architecture emphasis
+   - Preservation testing
+   - Documentation updates
+
+## Memory Integration
+
+### Stored Artifacts
+- Phase outputs and decisions
+- Quality gate results
+- Architectural decisions
+- Test strategies
+- Lessons learned
+
+### Retrieval Patterns
+- Check previous similar projects
+- Reuse architectural patterns
+- Apply learned optimizations
+- Avoid past pitfalls
+
+## Success Metrics
+
+### Phase Metrics
+- Specification completeness
+- Algorithm efficiency
+- Architecture clarity
+- Code quality scores
+- Documentation coverage
+
+### Overall Metrics
+- Time per phase
+- Quality gate pass rate
+- Defect discovery timing
+- Methodology compliance